Why I'm Voting for Ron Paul
Since I've been pretty obnoxious about promoting Ron Paul for President, I thought I should explain why. So, here are 10 reasons why I'll be pulling the "Ron Paul" lever tomorrow in the South Carolina Primary. (video at the end)
Constitution
He's the only candidate that truly grasps the intention of the U.S. Constitution – limited federal power. There's a reason this document is sometmes vague and tends to not address a lot of issues. The individual states are grown up enough to make their own decisions.
Economics
He's the only candidate that truly understands the definition of "broke". Our economic problems are based in only one problem. We spend WAY too much, and nothing can fix that until we stop.
Free Market
He's the only candidate that truly believes in a free market. Just look at voting records. As long as there are bale-outs of any kind we only have different levels of a socialistic free market, and it won't survive. It just gets to expensive to keep alive. No system has ever failed because of too much freedom, only too much government.
Consistency
He's the only candidate that is saying the same thing today as he did yesterday, and before that, and before that,... I guess when your message is simple and based on the Constitution, its hard for your postition to change.
Israel
He's the only candidate that is truly pro-Israel. You can't be any more pro-Israel than to believe that they don't need us to defend them, that hey are fine without us. Plus, how can financially supporting Israel's enemies be anything less than anti-Isreal? I also have a fear that the other candidates have schatological reasons for "supporting" Isreal based on bad interpretation of the Bible and of "Israel's" role at the "end of the world", and frankly, that scares me.
Compromise
Knowing full well how things in Washington work, I fully understand that no President will get everything he/she wants. But, if Ron Paul had to compromise, he would be further away from the status quo than from where the other candidates would even start.
Rick Santorum
In short, when I listen to his rhetoric about the federal role in defining marriage, along side of his wanting to put back in place "Don't ask don't tell", I can come to no other conclusion than his "pro-family" stance stems from "anti-homosexual" beliefs. No thanks.
Newt Gingrich
I would personally give just about anything to see Gingrich and Obama in a Lincoln/Douglas style debate. I would almost even feel sorry for the current President if it were to happen. But, Newt lost me with his absolute hatred and disregard for his fellow Republican, Ron Paul, while moaning about how unfair Romney's attacks against him were. Man up Newt. The democrats are your enemy and they would destroy you. (But kudos ripping apart John King last night. That was good TV)
Mitt Romeny
Flip-flopping? Romneycare? Unable to answer "yes" or "no" about tax returns? Take your pick.
vs. Obama
Ron Paul is the only candidate that has a clear distinction from President Obama at all levels. Romney has healthcare similariies. Gingrich has imigration similarities. Santorum has right-to-work similarities. And before you say Paul has anti-war similarities, don't forget, Obama has only continued Bush's foreign policy and actually expanded it in Afghanastan and created his own in Libya.
It just seems like a no-brainer to me. I want something different in Washington, and that's why Ron Paul will be getting my vote tomorrow.


